This IP address has been reported a total of
10
times from
9 distinct
sources.
200.26.191.99 was first reported on
, and the most recent report was
.
In the last 60 days, the top reporter locations were:
United States of America
with 4
reports;
France
with 2
reports;
Switzerland
with 1
report.
The most common categories in these recent reports were:
DDoS Attack
4
times;
Brute-Force
4
times;
Exploited Host
4
times;
Bad Web Bot
4
times;
Web App Attack
3
times;
Other
2
times.
Recent Reports
We have received reports of abusive activity from this IP address within the last week. It is
potentially still actively engaged in abusive activities.
Fail2Ban: 200.26.191.99 was banned for Aggressive Bad Bot detected by Nginx/Fail2Ban. UA: Mozilla/5. ...
show moreFail2Ban: 200.26.191.99 was banned for Aggressive Bad Bot detected by Nginx/Fail2Ban. UA: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/144.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
show less
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/144.0. ...
show moreMozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/144.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
show less
Botnet UDP flood (DDoS) against a host in AS203136 (LLC Ordunet), Georgia, on 2026-09-11 between 01: ...
show moreBotnet UDP flood (DDoS) against a host in AS203136 (LLC Ordunet), Georgia, on 2026-09-11 between 01:00 and 02:30 local time (+04:00). This source sent UDP to port 47472 of 185.143.177.x at more than 800 packets/sec. Nothing listens on that port - repeated full packet captures of all traffic reaching this machine recorded its services on other UDP ports and never a single packet to 47472 - so this cannot be a client of anything; it is flood by definition, independent of any rate measurement. One of 1958 sources in 956 networks and 110 countries in the same wave. Detected on a MikroTik RouterOS router in the raw/prerouting chain (dst-limit 800,200,src-address/10s); the timestamp is when this source crossed the threshold. The host is almost certainly compromised and part of a botnet. Evidence: [email protected].
show less
UDP flood (DDoS) vs AS215599: 455 pkts / 0.65 MB to UDP 80/8443 across 251 dst IP(s), 2026-08-19 21: ...
show moreUDP flood (DDoS) vs AS215599: 455 pkts / 0.65 MB to UDP 80/8443 across 251 dst IP(s), 2026-08-19 21:46 to 2026-08-20 00:36 CEST. No legitimate service on these UDP ports (7-day baseline 0 GB/day). Carpet-bombing of a /24, likely botnet-compromised host. Evidence: sFlow + hardware ACL counters.
show less
UDP flood (DDoS) vs AS215599: 455 pkts / 0.65 MB to UDP 80/8443 across 251 dst IP(s), 2026-08-19 21: ...
show moreUDP flood (DDoS) vs AS215599: 455 pkts / 0.65 MB to UDP 80/8443 across 251 dst IP(s), 2026-08-19 21:46 to 2026-08-20 00:36 CEST. No legitimate service on these UDP ports (7-day baseline 0 GB/day). Carpet-bombing of a /24, likely botnet-compromised host. Evidence: sFlow + hardware ACL counters.
show less
DDoS Attack
Exploited Host
Showing 1 to
10
of 10 reports
Think this IP has been falsely reported? You may request to have the associated
reports reviewed and removed.
Request Takedown ๐ฉ
