WordPress WordFence blocking report: The reason is: "Exceeded the maximum number of page not found ...
show moreWordPress WordFence blocking report: The reason is: "Exceeded the maximum number of page not found errors per minute for a crawler.". User location: Shanghai, China
show less
On Sep 23, 2025 at 12:59:25 PDT I received an unsolicited “Login Details” email claiming a new user ...
show moreOn Sep 23, 2025 at 12:59:25 PDT I received an unsolicited “Login Details” email claiming a new user registration at “Log Cabin Kits,” with a BINANCE-themed username and links pushing to wp-login and tracking redirects. This appears to be abusive account creation / credential-phishing via a third-party sender.
Header auth: SPF=pass (mg.logcabinkits.com via 69.72.42.10); DKIM=pass (mg.logcabinkits.com; mailgun.org); DMARC=none/not present. Despite passing auth, content is deceptive/unsolicited. Potential RFC 5321/5322 misuse (unsolicited bulk, misleading content). Violates CAN-SPAM (15 U.S.C. §7701 et seq.; deceptive practices).
Sending IP: 69.72.42.10 (m42-10.mailgun.net, Mailgun Technologies). Mail server IP: 69.72.42.10. Please investigate and terminate abuse. Abuse contact: [email protected]show less
WordPress blocked by WordFence: 2607:9000:6000:17::a03e (Canada)
Blocked for Directory Traversal ...
show moreWordPress blocked by WordFence: 2607:9000:6000:17::a03e (Canada)
Blocked for Directory Traversal in query string: s = ../\think\Container/invokefunction
show less
This spam was received on Sat, 20 Sep 2025 at 08:56:37 -0700. The sending IP was 102.129.234.177, re ...
show moreThis spam was received on Sat, 20 Sep 2025 at 08:56:37 -0700. The sending IP was 102.129.234.177, relayed through the mail server mail.dabed.cl at 190.82.96.27. The message falsely presented itself as coming from “Kadulina [email protected] with a reply-to of a Gmail account. The “From” field used the recipient’s name in a deceptive way. The subject line read “Please Get back ASAP” and the body claimed to be from a deputy chairman at Ukrsibbank Ukraine offering an urgent financial opportunity.
Header analysis shows SPF returned “none,” and no DKIM or DMARC authentication passed, indicating this was not authorized mail from the claimed domain. The use of localhost and internal relays (127.0.0.1) further suggest this was deliberately injected to evade filters. The content is a classic phishing advance-fee fraud attempt designed to harvest personal or financial details.
This activity constitutes email fraud, wire fraud attempts, and violates international anti-spam laws as well as RFC 5321/5322
show less
he spam email was received on Wed, 17 Sep 2025 at 17:20:05 -0700. It originated from sending IP 62.6 ...
show morehe spam email was received on Wed, 17 Sep 2025 at 17:20:05 -0700. It originated from sending IP 62.60.130.120 through mail server 217.112.31.24 (mx.litaform.ru). The message falsely claimed to be from Berkshire Hathaway and the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, offering $20.5 million for “poverty alleviation.” The content requested personal details such as name, address, phone number, and date of birth, which are classic signs of a financial phishing scam.
The header shows SPF passed, but no valid DKIM or DMARC alignment was found. The From field used the recipient’s name as false, attempting to impersonate a trusted identity. The email also included a deceptive external link to trick the recipient into believing the scam was legitimate. This demonstrates clear intent to defraud and harvest personal information.
This activity violates multiple laws including CAN-SPAM (unsolicited deceptive emails), wire fraud statutes (18 U.S.C. §1343), and constitutes RFC 5321/5322 violations
show less
Being sent to an email address I NEVER USE
-----
Received Tue, 16 Sep 2025 12:48:03 GMT. Originate ...
show moreBeing sent to an email address I NEVER USE
-----
Received Tue, 16 Sep 2025 12:48:03 GMT. Originated from mail.receita.pb.gov.br (Sending IP/MTA IP: 200.164.224.12) to iCloud SMTP. Host appears operated by sefaz.pb.gov.br / receita.pb.gov.br. Abuse/ops contacts: [email protected][email protected]
Subject: “Claim Code: 211822”. From: “Pch Lottery” [email protected] Reply-To: [email protected]
Unsolicited lottery/prize solicitation attempting to move replies to an unrelated domain, consistent with phishing/advance-fee tactics. Includes internal Zimbra headers; no prior relationship with recipient.
Auth: SPF=pass (200.164.224.12), DKIM=pass (d=sefaz.pb.gov.br), DMARC=pass (policy=none); ARC=none; BIMI=skipped (insufficient DMARC). Despite alignment, content/Reply-To mismatch suggests account/server abuse. Likely violates CAN-SPAM (15 U.S.C. §7704) for deceptive/misleading headers; potential wire fraud (18 U.S.C. §1343). Misleading fields contravene RFC 5322.
show less
The message was received Fri, 19 Sep 2025 01:18:47 -0700 (PDT). Content is an advance-fee “I am an A ...
show moreThe message was received Fri, 19 Sep 2025 01:18:47 -0700 (PDT). Content is an advance-fee “I am an American soldier on active duty in Yemen… legal offer” solicitation asking me to reply for details. Reply-To points to a different domain (Outlook) than the From, a common fraud lure.
Technical summary: Sent via in-mum-m57.icewarpcloud.in [103.161.42.41] (IceWarp). Header also shows probable client/origin tpcglobe.co.in [27.59.77.45]. SPF: pass; DKIM: pass; DMARC: pass (p=NONE). These “passes” indicate an abused mailbox/server rather than a simple spoof.
Legal/RFC: Unsolicited deceptive solicitation violates anti-spam/anti-fraud laws (e.g., CAN-SPAM/advance-fee fraud statutes) and likely the provider’s AUP. No obvious SMTP/5321/5322 header violations, but the scheme and bulk sending are abusive. Network owner/host: IceWarp Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (AS137488).
Host/ownership refs: in-mum-m57.icewarpcloud.in → 103.161.42.41 and IceWarp ASN/contacts (AS137488, abuse mailbox). stat.ripe.net+3
show less
Received Tue, Sep 16, 2025 11:23:49 -0700 (PDT). Unsolicited bulk “Merchant Cash Advance” solicitati ...
show moreReceived Tue, Sep 16, 2025 11:23:49 -0700 (PDT). Unsolicited bulk “Merchant Cash Advance” solicitation targeting my corporation, promising “48-hour funding” and pushing tracking links (tracking.business-revenue.com) via ESP ElasticEmail. Sending IP 67.227.85.156 m156.mxout.mta4.net (Host: Liquid Web — [email protected]
, +1-800-580-4985). Auth: SPF pass for business-revenue.com (67.227.85.156); DKIM pass for business-revenue.com and elasticemail.com; DMARC result not present in header (likely not published or not evaluated). This is unwanted UCE and likely violates CAN-SPAM (15 U.S.C. §7701 et seq.; 16 CFR Part 316) due to unsolicited commercial advertising and deceptive subject personalization using my company name. No obvious RFC 5321/5322 formatting errors; abuse is legal/policy, not protocol. Please investigate and halt spam from this host.
show less
WordPress WordFence rerporting: 144.126.129.197 (United States)
Blocked for Known malicious User-Ag ...
show moreWordPress WordFence rerporting: 144.126.129.197 (United States)
Blocked for Known malicious User-Agents
show less
HackingBrute-ForceBad Web BotExploited HostWeb App Attack
WordPress WordFence rerporting: 5.175.234.40 (United States)
Blocked for WordPress New Install File ...
show moreWordPress WordFence rerporting: 5.175.234.40 (United States)
Blocked for WordPress New Install File Probing
show less
HackingBrute-ForceBad Web BotExploited HostWeb App Attack
WordPress WordFence rerporting: 20.55.73.223 (United States)
Blocked for Exchange Proxy(Not?)Shell ...
show moreWordPress WordFence rerporting: 20.55.73.223 (United States)
Blocked for Exchange Proxy(Not?)Shell CVE-2022–41040 and CVE-2022–41082
show less
HackingBrute-ForceBad Web BotExploited HostWeb App Attack
WordPress WordFence rerporting: 144.126.133.71 (United States)
Blocked for WordPress New Install Fi ...
show moreWordPress WordFence rerporting: 144.126.133.71 (United States)
Blocked for WordPress New Install File Probing
show less
HackingSQL InjectionBrute-ForceBad Web BotWeb App Attack
Reported by BadBot plug-in on WordPress:
The reason is: "Exceeded the maximum number of page not ...
show moreReported by BadBot plug-in on WordPress:
The reason is: "Exceeded the maximum number of page not found errors per minute for a crawler.".
The duration of the block is 5 days.
User IP: 5.175.234.40
User hostname: 5.175.234.40
User location: Germany
show less
HackingBrute-ForceBad Web Bot
By clicking “Accept all”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to remember preferences and
analyze site usage.
Read more
- Required to log into your AbuseIPDB account, and store these cookie preferences.